Lindbloom v. Lindbloom
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Appeal is from an amended decree in so far as it modifies alimony and from a subsequent order denying a new trial regarding such alimony.
In 1926 plaintiff obtained a decree of divorce from defendant on the ground of his cruel and inhuman treatment. There were no children. In the decree was awarded $50 per month alimony, and by subsequent amendment this was modified by the provision “until plaintiff remarries.” In May, 1929, defendant was before the court on an order to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt for failure to pay alimony past due, and at the same time was heard a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cole v. ColeIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Stanfield v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Weber v. WeberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Hartigan v. HartiganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Haskell v. HaskellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Christiano v. ChristianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- Kaehler v. KaehlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Garlinger v. GarlingerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Courson v. CoursonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Sieber v. SieberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.