Legal Opinion

Cahaley v. Cahaley

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 10, 1943No. 33,556PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Youngbahl, Justice.

This appeal is from an order denying a motion to vacate a default judgment in a divorce action and permit defendant to answer. It appears that a former action for divorce was instituted by plaintiff in Hennepin county in February 1942.. Defendant appeared and answered. Shortly thereafter plaintiff dismissed the action and left the state for a period of several months. Upon his return, the present action was commenced in Eamsey county. Summons was personally served on defendant on January 11, 1943. No answer having been interposed, the cause was placed on the default…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heiman v. Phœnix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
  2. Wilhelm v. WilhelmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Scribner v. ScribnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  4. Laird v. LairdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Burch v. BurchCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  2. Townsend v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Hafner v. HafnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Bredemann v. BredemannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. Hernández Torres ex rel. Zapater Hernández v. Zapater MartínezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API