Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Schirmer

California Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1912No. L.A. No. 2880PublishedCited by 20 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

This was an action brought by plaintiff for damages for personal injuries. Originally the wife of defendant was made a party to the action but at the close of the testimony for the plaintiff, the court granted defendant’s motion for nonsuit as to her. The jury rendered a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of nineteen hundred dollars and from the judgment entered thereon, as well as the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial this appeal is taken.

The trouble resulting in the injuries to plaintiff occurred in a lodging-house owned by defendant who had just served on plaintiff’s brother a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bedell v. HerringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Marriott v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. People v. NortheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Hughes v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. People v. RomeroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State Rubbish Collectors Ass'n v. SiliznoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Crooks v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Cameron Compress Co. v. KubeckaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Bartosh v. BanningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Marston v. Pickwick Stages, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1926

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API