Legal Opinion

Marriott v. Williams

California Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1908No. S.F. No. 4215PublishedCited by 56 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries inflicted upon the plaintiff by defendants. The jury rendered a verdict against the defendant, Williams, alone, and judgment was entered accordingly. The appeal is by the defendant, Williams, from an order denying his motion-for a new trial.

The complaint alleges that the defendants entered plaintiff’s home and there assaulted, beat, and wounded him, shooting him twice in the leg, breaking both bones below the knee and piercing the fleshy part of the thigh, and bruising and cutting his head and hand. The answer admits that Beale…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sloan v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  2. Corcoran v. HarranWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Fenelon v. ButtsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Draper v. BakerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Brown v. EvansUnited States Circuit Court · 1883

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Coy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. People v. ShirokowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Delos v. Farmers Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API