Legal Opinion
Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided January 31, 2012No. Slip Op. 12-14. Court No. 07-00323PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANCEU, Judge:
Plaintiff Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. (“Ashley”), a domestic furniture manufacturer, brought three similar actions (now consolidated) 1 during the period of September 4, 2007 through March 4, 2010, all stemming from certain administrative determinations of the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC” or the “Commission”) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs” or “CBP”). The ITC denied Ashley status as an “affected domestic producer” (“ADP”) under the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (the “CDSOA” or “Byrd Amendment”), Pub.L. No. 106-387,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Standard Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Nsk Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Tampa Bay Fisheries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Ashley Furniture Indus., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.