Legal Opinion

Nsk Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 6, 2012No. Consol. 07-00223PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARMAN, Judge:

Plaintiff brought two cases 1 challenging the constitutionality of the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA” or “Byrd Amendment”). 2 These cases were consolidated by order of the court under Consol. Ct. No. 07-00223. (Order, Consol. Ct. No. 07-00223, Jan. 25, 2012, ECF No. 83.) Plaintiff claims that it unlawfully was denied affected domestic producer (“ADP”) status, which would have qualified it to receive distributions for fiscal years 2005-2007 under the CDSOA. The consolidated case is now before the Court on dispositive motions. Defendant United…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
  2. Nan Ya Plastics Corp., Am. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API