Legal Opinion
Tampa Bay Fisheries, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided March 20, 2012No. Slip Op. 12-37; Court 08-00404PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GORDON, Judge:
This case arose from the actions of two agencies, the U.S. International Trade Commission (the “ITC” or the “Commission”) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”), that denied Plaintiffs, Tampa Bay Fisheries, Inc. (“Tampa Bay”) and Singleton Fisheries, Inc. (“Singleton”), certain monetary benefits under the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA” or “Byrd Amendment”), 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000), repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.L. 109-171, § 7601(a), 120 Stat. 4, 154 (Feb. 8, 2006; effective Oct. 1, 2007). The ITC did not include…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Snyder v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Allen v. Westpoint-Pepperell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nan Ya Plastics Corp., Am. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- The Barden Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012