Legal Opinion
State v. Tanzella
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 27, 1993No. 14627PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The certified issue in this appeal is whether, pursuant to Practice Book § 624,1 the trial court properly permitted the state to amend a criminal information after the commencement of trial. The defendant, Richard J. Tanzella, was convicted after a jury trial of two counts of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70,2 and one count each of assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-61 (a) (1),3 threatening *603in violation of General Statutes § 53a-62 (a) (l),4 and unlawful restraint in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. McKnightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. FrankoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. GrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. ScognamiglioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. SalamonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Jaroslaw Chrzanoski 1 v. John Ashcroft, U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Harrington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- State v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Whyte v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.