Legal Opinion
State v. McKnight
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 13, 1983No. 9838PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The defendant was convicted after a trial to a jury of five counts of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (4). On this appeal he claims that the trial court erred: (1) in refusing to suppress the out-of-court and in-court identifications; (2) in refusing the defendant’s request for a two-day continuance to locate an absent witness; (3) in refusing to reopen the case after it had been submitted to the jury when that witness became available; (4) in instructing the jury regarding the identification and alibi evidence adduced at trial; and (5) in permitting…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- State v. BoscarinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. TatumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.