Legal Opinion

Cementech, Inc. v. City of Fairlawn

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 13, 2005No. 22309PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Whitmore, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Cementech, has appealed from a decision of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas that limited the potential damages it could receive for bid-preparation costs. This court affirms in part and reverses in part.

I

{¶ 2} The instant matter stems from a request for bids for a service road in Fairlawn by defendant-appellee, the city of Fairlawn. Plaintiff-appellant, Cementech, submitted a bid for the service-road project. Fairlawn rejected the bid. On December 31, 2001, Cementech filed a “verified complaint for legal and equitable relief and writ…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. GrubbOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Akron-Canton Waste Oil, Inc. v. Safety-Kleen Oil Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Garrett v. City of SanduskyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. City of Akron v. FrazierOhio Court of Appeals · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cementech, Inc. v. City of FairlawnOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State ex. rel. Northern Ohio Chapter of Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Barberton City School District Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Meccon, Inc. v. University of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Sims v. DiblerOhio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API