Cementech, Inc. v. City of Fairlawn
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Whitmore, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Cementech, has appealed from a decision of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas that limited the potential damages it could receive for bid-preparation costs. This court affirms in part and reverses in part.
I
{¶ 2} The instant matter stems from a request for bids for a service road in Fairlawn by defendant-appellee, the city of Fairlawn. Plaintiff-appellant, Cementech, submitted a bid for the service-road project. Fairlawn rejected the bid. On December 31, 2001, Cementech filed a “verified complaint for legal and equitable relief and writ…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. GrubbOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Akron-Canton Waste Oil, Inc. v. Safety-Kleen Oil Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Garrett v. City of SanduskyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Akron v. FrazierOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cementech, Inc. v. City of FairlawnOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex. rel. Northern Ohio Chapter of Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Barberton City School District Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Meccon, Inc. v. University of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Sims v. DiblerOhio Court of Appeals · 2007