Legal Opinion
Cementech, Inc. v. City of Fairlawn
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 2006No. Nos. 2005-0970 and 2005-0971PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.
{¶ 1} On December 1 and 8, 2001, the appellant, the city of Fairlawn, publicly advertised that it was accepting bids for a service-road project. The appellant later issued an addendum on December 10, 2001, to include planting pear trees as part of the project.
{¶ 2} On December 17, 2001, the bids were opened, and the appellant’s law director notified the appellee, Cementech, Inc., that its bid had been rejected for failure to include the addendum in the bid. A few days later, the Fairlawn City Board of Audit and Review held a meeting in which it reviewed the submitted bids, as well as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Garono v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Danis Clarkco Landfill Co. v. Clark County Solid Waste Management DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Ranells v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Leaseway Distribution Centers, Inc. v. Department of Administrative ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Hardrives Paving & Construction, Inc. v. City of NilesOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Horsfield Materials, Inc. v. City of DyersvilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- State ex. rel. Northern Ohio Chapter of Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Barberton City School District Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Empower Aviation, L.L.C. v. Butler County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Meccon, Inc. v. University of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Tp Mechanical Contractors v. Franklin Cty. Bd., 08ap-108 (12-23-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.