State v. Hill
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
Appellant has raised twenty-six propositions of law. We have reviewed each and, for the reasons stated, we find that none justifies reversal of appellant’s convictions for the crimes of aggravated murder, aggravated burglary, and kidnapping. We have also independently reviewed the record, weighed the aggravating circumstances against the mitigating factors, and examined the appropriateness and proportionality of the death sentence in this case. Upon review of the record, we affirm appellant’s convictions and death sentence.
I
Prosecutorial Misconduct-Penalty Phase
In his first and second…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by488 opinions
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. HancockOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. McKelton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
483 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.