Legal Opinion
United States v. Lang
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided September 21, 1994No. 1:94-cv-00057PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COBB, District Judge.
Plaintiff, the United States of America, initiated this suit to recover removal and remedial action costs under § 107(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. § 9607 (1988). Plaintiff alleges that it incurred these costs at the Turtle Bayou Superfund Site (Turtle Bayou) in Liberty County, Texas.
Defendant ARCO Chemical Company (ACC) now seeks to be dismissed from the suit or, in the alternative, to be granted summary judgment. ACC claims that it is not responsible for the cleanup as it not a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Carolina Transformer Company Dewey Strother Kenneth Ray Strother Faytranco, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Richard L. Conkling v. Bert S. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re 1701 Commerce, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2014
- Vine Street, LLC v. Keeling Ex Rel. Estate of KeelingDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2006
- Fina, Inc. v. ArcoDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1998
- Hobart Corporation v. The Dayton Power and Light CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- Lickteig v. Tri-Steel Structures, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.