Legal Opinion
Hobart Corporation v. The Dayton Power and Light Company
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided September 23, 2019No. 3:13-cv-00115Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION HOBART CORPORATION, et a/., . Plaintiffs, V. Case No. 3:13-cv-115 THE DAYTON POWER & LIGHT JUDGE WALTER H. RICE CO., et al., Defendants. DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF PATRICK DOYLE, ESQ. (DOC. #858); OVERRULING WASTE MANAGEMENT OF OHIO, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING SCA SERVICES OF OHIO, INC. (DOC. #870) Plaintiffs, Hobart Corporation, Kelsey-Hayes Company and NCR Corporation, filed suit against numerous defendants under the Comprehensive…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Interroyal Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ralph H. Sponseller, and Superior Roll-Forming Company, Inc., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.