Legal Opinion

Lickteig v. Tri-Steel Structures, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided November 8, 2001No. 99-2426-DJWPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WAXSE, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. Introduction

Plaintiffs bring this action against Defendant Tri-Steel Structures, Inc. (TriSteel) to recover a judgment that Plaintiffs obtained against Advanced Framing Systems, Inc. (AFS). Plaintiffs contend that Tri-Steel is a successor to, or the continuation of, of AFS, and that Tri-Steel is thus liable to pay the judgment Plaintiffs obtained against AFS.

At the Pretrial Conference in this case, the parties agreed to forego a jury trial and to instead submit stipulated facts upon which the Court could decide this action. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Shannon v. Samuel Langston CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1974
  3. Cyr v. B. Offen & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
  4. Glasscock v. Armstrong Cork Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  5. Western Resources Life Insurance Co. v. GerhardtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API