Legal Opinion

Gilman v. Beverly California Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 12, 1991No. H005882PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COTTLE, J.

Introduction

Defendant Beverly California Corporation (hereafter Beverly), operator of a licensed skilled nursing facility, appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict in this medical malpractice wrongful death action. Beverly contends the trial court committed prejudicial error in excluding evidence pertaining to the allocation of negligence between Beverly and the decedent’s treating physician, and in prohibiting Beverly’s key expert witness from responding to plaintiffs’ expert’s testimony. Beverly also contends that the noneconomic damage award must be reversed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Cross v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Canavin v. Pacific Southwest AirlinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Randles v. LowryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Atkins v. StrayhornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. General Electric Co. v. NiemetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. Johnson v. Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. MacRiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Taing v. Johnson Scaffolding Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API