Legal Opinion
State v. Hardesty
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 9, 1996No. 63229-4PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
915 P.2d 1080 (1996)
129 Wash.2d 303
The STATE of Washington, Petitioner,
v.
Herbert David HARDESTY, Respondent.
No. 63229-4.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued March 7, 1996.
Decided May 9, 1996.
Richard L. Weber, Okanogan County Prosecutor, Okanogan, for petitioner.
Scot D. Stuart, Okanogan, for respondent.
TALMADGE, Justice.
Herbert D. Hardesty (Hardesty) allegedly defrauded the trial court by failing to accurately relate his criminal history, thereby obtaining a more favorable sentence. He fully served the sentence, and now claims the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. HickmanWashington Supreme Court · 1998
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.