Legal Opinion
Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District v. Jarvis
California Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 1959No. Sac. 7026PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment awarding them $1,500 for 1.062 acres of land in a condemnation action.
Facts: This ease came on for trial on February 1, 1956, before the Honorable Gordon A. Fleury, Judge of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. The action was instituted by the Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District and concerned real property located in Sacramento County.
Prior to the jury roll call and the voir dire examination of the jury, it was stipulated between plaintiff’s attorneys and defendants’ attorney, in the presence of Judge Fleury in his chambers, that said judge…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation Dist. v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Cox v. Tyrone Power Enterprises Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Dempsey v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Reichert v. General Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Shakin v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. O'MalleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. NahabedianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. MurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.