Legal Opinion

Alloway v. Nashville

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1890PublishedCited by 89 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Davidson County. W. K. MoAlisteb, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

This proceeding was instituted by the city of Nashville in August, 1887, to condemn and appropriate what is known as “Kirkpatrick’s *513Hill” for reservoir purposes. The jury of view assessed the damages at $9,686. Alloway and wife, the owners of the property, appealed from that report, and obtained a trial in the Circuit Court, where verdict and judgment were rendered for $12,532. From that judgment Allowmy and wife have prosecuted an appeal in error to this Court.

The assignment of errors presents several important and interesting questions of law and practice, which it is necessary to consider…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Moulton v. Newburyport Water Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  3. Stinson v. Chicago, St. Paul & Minneapolis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1880

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. State v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Morton Butler Timber Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1912

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API