Federal Mining & Engineering Co. v. Pollak
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Ducker, J.:
The plaintiff in the lower court, respondent here, commenced this action for the foreclosure of a mortgage on certain mining property and personal property appurtenant thereto.
It was alleged in the complaint that the mortgage was given by the defendant to secure a promissory note made, executed and delivered by it to plaintilf in the sum of $25,000. Facts showing the necessity of appointment of a receiver to take possession of the mortgaged premises and property were alleged. Defendant answered, denying generally the material allegations of the complaint. It was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Terhune v. WeiseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Defanti v. Allen Clark Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1921
- Foster v. Belcher's Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Hough v. Reserve Gold Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Peters Grazing Association v. LegerskiWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
- Meeker v. Ambassador Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Johnston v. DelayNevada Supreme Court · 1945
- Foster v. ArataNevada Supreme Court · 1958
- Spain Management Co. v. Packs' Auto Sales, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.