Legal Opinion

Foster v. Arata

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1958No. 4009PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, C. J.:

Foster and Parman and others, appellants here, as plaintiffs below, sued Arata, Gianelli and Battilana, defendants below and respondents here, in a derivative action seeking a decree declaring void two deeds of trust and a chattel mortgage executed to the defendants by Tahoe Enterprises Incorporated whose stock was owned in part by the plaintiffs and in part by the defendants. By sale under the powers the defendants had bought in all of the mortgaged real and personal property and thereafter sold the same to third parties. For a period prior to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Lebold v. Inland Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  4. Mayflower Hotel Stockholders Protective Committee v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  5. Hallam v. Indianola Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1881

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Buchanan (In Re Western World Funding, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 1985
  2. Shoen v. SAC Holding Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Drobbin v. Nicolet Instrument Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  4. Estate of Trenchard v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995
  5. GUZMAN VS. JOHNSONNevada Supreme Court · 2021

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API