Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1955PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.

Defendants contend that there is no testimony supporting the jury’s findings of negligence on the part of Steinfeldt. The roadway was dry, the weather clear, and it was “quite light.” Since we are unable to say that the plaintiff’s story is incredible we may assume that the jury concluded, as they had the right to do, that when he alighted from the bits the rear end of the bus was near the north line of Plighway D. He testified that as he stepped from the bus he looked to the north and saw a car which turned out to be that of Steinfeldt, about a mile down the road; that he walked south across…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Grohusky v. FerryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Van Matre v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Transport Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Johnson v. ViebrockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Swanson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Timm v. RahnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Collins v. Eli Lilly & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Cirillo v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. KaatzAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Grana v. SummerfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API