Legal Opinion

Mullen v. Reischl

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1960PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCuRRiE, J.

The issues raised on this appeal by the appellant plaintiff are as follows:(1) Is there any credible evidence to sustain the finding of the jury with respect to the contributory negligence of the plaintiff ?(2) Was the negligence of the defendant Reischl as a matter of law greater than that of the plaintiff?(3) Is there credible evidence to sustain the jury’s findings of causal negligence because of the tampering with the boards covering the stair well on the part of the impleaded defendants Mertins?(4) Was it error for the trial court to grant a nonsuit as to the cause of action grounded…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Henthorn v. M. G. C. Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Firkus v. RombalskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Zehren v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Widell v. Holy Trinity Catholic ChurchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Caldwell v. Piggly Wiggly Madison Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Lawver v. City of Park FallsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API