Velasquez v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALDRICH, J.
INTRODUCTION
While riding his bicycle, Jorge Velasquez, Jr., collided with a pedestrian, seriously injuring her. He was charged with recklessly driving a “vehicle” under Vehicle Code section 23103. One section of the code, however, defines “vehicle” in a way that excludes bicycles. (§ 670.) Another section of the code subjects a bicyclist to “all the provisions applicable to the driver of a vehicle.” (§ 21200, subd. (a).) Given the seeming tension between the two sections, can a bicyclist be charged with recklessly driving a “vehicle”? We conclude, yes, a bicyclist can be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Ennabe v. ManosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. AhmedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Van Horn v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. Derrick B.California Supreme Court · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ayala v. Dawson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- People v. WattsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Midland Funding LLC v. RomeroAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2016
- Ayala v. DawsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Beale v. Dept. of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.