Legal Opinion

Velasquez v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 17, 2014No. B253327PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALDRICH, J.

INTRODUCTION

While riding his bicycle, Jorge Velasquez, Jr., collided with a pedestrian, seriously injuring her. He was charged with recklessly driving a “vehicle” under Vehicle Code section 23103. One section of the code, however, defines “vehicle” in a way that excludes bicycles. (§ 670.) Another section of the code subjects a bicyclist to “all the provisions applicable to the driver of a vehicle.” (§ 21200, subd. (a).) Given the seeming tension between the two sections, can a bicyclist be charged with recklessly driving a “vehicle”? We conclude, yes, a bicyclist can be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Ennabe v. ManosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. People v. AhmedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Van Horn v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. People v. Derrick B.California Supreme Court · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ayala v. Dawson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. People v. WattsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Midland Funding LLC v. RomeroAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2016
  4. Ayala v. DawsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Beale v. Dept. of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API