Legal Opinion

People v. Derrick B.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 2006No. S124205PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

Here we conclude that a juvenile offender may not be ordered to register as a sex offender under Penal Code section 290 if his offenses are not among those listed in subdivision (d)(3).

I. Factual and Procedural Background

At the age of 17 Derrick B. was committed to the California Youth Authority. The commitment followed four years of juvenile court intervention beginning when Derrick was accused of lewd and lascivious acts with a child under 14. (§ 288, subd. (a).) Derrick was then 13 years old and living with the family of a 10-year-old girl. While she slept, he reached…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. LuckyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. RamirezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. R.G. (In re R.G.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. In re FriendCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Moran v. Murtaugh Miller Meyer & Nelson, LLPCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. People v. Jose C.California Supreme Court · 2009

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API