Legal Opinion

People v. Ahmed

California Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 2011No. S191020PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

A jury convicted defendant of one crime—assault with a firearm—and found true two sentence enhancement allegations as to that crime—personal use of a firearm and personal infliction of great bodily injury. We granted review to decide the relevance, if any, of Penal Code section 654, which generally prohibits multiple punishments for the same act or omission, to the question of whether a court may impose multiple enhancements for a single crime; and, more specifically, whether the court properly imposed both enhancements in this case.1

We conclude that a court deciding how…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. CoronadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. People v. JeffersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. AveryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. People v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People v. LouieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. People v. CallesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. People v. ElderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Velasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API