Legal Opinion

Van Horn v. Watson

California Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 2008No. S152360PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORENO, J.

Under well-established common law principles, a person has no duty to come to the aid of another. (Artiglio v. Corning, Inc. (1998) 18 Cal.4th 604, 613 [76 Cal.Rptr.2d 479, 957 P.2d 1313]; Williams v.. State of California (1983) 34 Cal.3d 18, 23 [192 Cal.Rptr. 233, 664 P.2d 137].) If, however, a person elects to come to someone’s aid, he or she has a duty to exercise due care. (Williams, supra, 34 Cal.3d at p. 23.) Thus, a “good Samaritan” who attempts to help someone might be liable if he or she does not exercise due care and ends up causing harm. {Ibid.) The Legislature has…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Williams v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Mexia v. Rinker Boat Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Ennabe v. ManosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Mt. Hawley Insurance v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Verdugo v. Target Corp.California Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Kelly v. CB&I CONSTRUCTORS, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2009

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API