Van Horn v. Watson
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORENO, J.
Under well-established common law principles, a person has no duty to come to the aid of another. (Artiglio v. Corning, Inc. (1998) 18 Cal.4th 604, 613 [76 Cal.Rptr.2d 479, 957 P.2d 1313]; Williams v.. State of California (1983) 34 Cal.3d 18, 23 [192 Cal.Rptr. 233, 664 P.2d 137].) If, however, a person elects to come to someone’s aid, he or she has a duty to exercise due care. (Williams, supra, 34 Cal.3d at p. 23.) Thus, a “good Samaritan” who attempts to help someone might be liable if he or she does not exercise due care and ends up causing harm. {Ibid.) The Legislature has…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Williams v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Mexia v. Rinker Boat Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Ennabe v. ManosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Mt. Hawley Insurance v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Verdugo v. Target Corp.California Supreme Court · 2014
- Kelly v. CB&I CONSTRUCTORS, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2009
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.