Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Edmundson v. . Edmundson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1942PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSchenck, J.

SEAWELL. J., dissenting. Civil action for divorce from bed and board and for custody of children of the marriage, instituted in Superior Court of Wayne County on 2 September, 1939. No pleadings were filed, but a consent judgment was entered. For alleged violation, of terms of this judgment, citation for contempt was issued by Harris, Judge holding courts of the Fourth Judicial District, returnable at courthouse in Lillington, North Carolina, on Tuesday, 5 May, during May Civil Term, 1942, of Superior Court of Harnett County, and, by consent of parties, heard by Johnson, Jr., Special Judge…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gardiner v. MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Bynum v. . PoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  4. Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Henry J. Heryey & Co. v. EdmundsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Taylor v. Triangle Porsche-Audi, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Lee v. . RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API