Legal Opinion

Overly Special School District v. Haber

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1927PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.

In the first error assigned it is claimed by defendant’s counsel that there is no evidence of the delivery *406of the bond; and that such delivery is one of the conditions precedent in order to fasten liability upon the sureties. Here it must be noted that it appears from the undisputed evidence that the bank made application to the plaintiff to become a legal depository of plaintiff’s funds; that the bond was prepared by the district attorney, and signed by the bank and by all of the sureties, for the express purpose of qualifying the bank to become a depository; and that the bank was designated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Wilkinson CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Baumann v. City of West AllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Myers v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  4. Webb v. FrengWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Brown v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Honolulu Roofing Co. v. FelixHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Jack v. Craighead Rice Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
  3. Rose v. RammMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Davison County v. Western Natl. BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Hughes County v. Security State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API