Legal Opinion

Rose v. Ramm

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1931No. Docket No. 133, Calendar No. 35,468PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

February 21, 1927, in part payment on the purchase price of property, defendant conveyed to plaintiff the vendor’s interest in a land contract running to Isadore Adler, as vendee. As part consideration for the deal, defendant executed to plaintiff an instrument, prepared by defendant, under •which he guaranteed payment of principal and interest on the Adler contract, according to its terms; and by which it was agreed that plaintiff, in case of delinquency in payment, should—

“first exhaust every customary means of making land contract collections, such as notifying the said vendee personally,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Overly Special School District v. HaberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. BAYER & MINGOLLA CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. v. DeschenesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  2. Honolulu Roofing Co. v. FelixHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Bank of Three Oaks v. Lakefront PropertiesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. In Re Landwehr's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. In Re GeneUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API