Legal Opinion

Honolulu Roofing Co. v. Felix

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1967No. 4481PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LEWIS, J.

By this appeal, taken by defendant Shuman Lumber & Supply Co., Inc., surety on a contractor’s bond, hereinafter referred to as “surety” or “Sbuman,” the surety (1) contests its liability to plaintiff, Honolulu Roofing Company, Ltd., which supplied materials and labor for sanding of floors, floor covering, and ceramic tile work in the construction of a residence for Albert M. Felix and his wife, hereinafter referred to as the “owners”; and (2) contests its liability to the owners.

The contractor, Edward M. Kirk, the principal on the bond, has made no appearance…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Peck v. HeurichSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Ford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  3. Federal Surety Co. v. Basin Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Pennsylvania Supply Co. v. National Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Waterhouse v. Capital Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1960

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Pure Milk Products Cooperative v. National Farmers OrganizationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Quin Blair Enterprises, Inc. v. Julien Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Reproductive Health Services, Inc. v. LeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Molokoa Village Development Co. v. Kauai Electric Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API