Legal Opinion
Jack v. Craighead Rice Milling Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 25, 1948No. 13607, 13608PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Circuit Judge.
These are appeals by the defendants from a judgment in an action brought to recover damages for failure of a contractor to perform a building contract.
The plaintiff, Craighead Rice Milling Company, entered into a contract with defendant J. M. Jack Construction Company for the construction of a rice drier at Gibson, Arkansas. The contract provided that the contractor should furnish all labor, material, tools, equipment, supplies and other materials of any nature to construct a rice drying plant and storage bins attached thereto, in accordance with plans and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hope Spoke Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Phœnix Insurance v. Public Parks Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
- Thomson v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- German-American Insurance v. HumphreySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
- Mill Owners Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Woodworkers Tool Works v. ByrneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Chicago & North Western Railway Company v. Arthur J. RiegerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Burch v. Reading CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- Allen v. Nelson Dodd Produce Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- Holliday v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.