Legal Opinion
In Re Oliver L. North (Omnibus Order)
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 7, 1994No. 86-6-GPublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
This matter came before the Court on various motions now pending, and it is the purpose of this order to dispose of those motions. The accompanying memorandum provides the rationale for the order to disclose the Report of the Independent Counsel. As to all other matters, we act in our discretion or for reasons apparent from the face of the order. It is therefore
ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that:(1) all motions to reconsider the release of the Final Report of the Independent Counsel are denied,(2) all motions to release the order are granted, to the extent previously allowed in our order…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- Buckley v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Morrison v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by89 opinions
- In Re Motions of Dow Jones & Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- In Re Sealed Case No. 98-3077Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- In Re Petition of Bruce Craig for Order Directing Release of Grand Jury Minutes. Bruce Craig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- In re Grand Jury Subpoena, MillerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- In Re: Sealed Case No. 99-3091(office of Independent Counsel Contempt Proceeding)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.