Legal Opinion

In Re Sealed Case No. 98-3077

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 14, 1998No. 98-3077, 98-3078, 98-3079 and 98-3081PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Per curiam

The Independent Counsel (IC) petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the district court to vacate its orders authorizing [' ] * to subpoena documents from the IC, conduct limited depositions of the IC and his staff, and subpoena the IC and his staff for similarly limited testimony at a show cause hearing relating to alleged violations of the grand jury secrecy rule. We conclude that we have power to determine the issues presented by the petition; resolving those issues in a substantially different way than the district court did, we issue the writ.

I

[ ] 1 filed motions in the district court…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. In re The City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. Belize Social Development Ltd. v. Government of BelizeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. Philip Morris Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  4. In re Al-NashiriCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  5. In re Grand Jury Subpoena, MillerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API