Legal Opinion

Kightlinger v. Public Utility Dist. No. 1

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 16, 2003No. 29296-3-IIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

81 P.3d 876 (2003)

119 Wash.App. 501

Garth KIGHTLINGER, Gary Scarbrough, Sid Sutherland, and Mark Williams, Respondents,

v.

PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF CLARK COUNTY, a/k/a Clark Public Utilities, Appellants.

No. 29296-3-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

December 16, 2003.

Donald Stewart Cohen, Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell et al., Joan C. Foley, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Ben Shafton, Attorney at Law, Vancouver, WA, for Respondent.

Richard Allan Finnigan, Attorney at Law, Olympia, WA, for Amicus Curiae WA Independent Telephone Assoc.

ARMSTRONG, J.

Garth Kightlinger[1] and…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Diversified Industries Development Corp. v. RipleyWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Buell v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. HarlanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. Bercier v. KigaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. Bercier v. KigaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. Okeson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API