Legal Opinion

People v. Harlan

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 16, 2002No. 01SA356PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez

In this original proceeding, petitioner Robert Harlan seeks to vacate the district court's order disqualifying his longtime counsel of choice. The district court disqualified Harlan's counsel of choice on an oral motion by the People during post-conviction proceedings. Harlan contends that the district court abused its discretion in ordering disqualification. We issued a rule to show cause and now make the rule absolute.

After reviewing the relevant facts and procedure, we review the principles governing disqualification. As our discussion indicates, a determination regarding disqualification…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. People v. CastroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  4. People v. HarlanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  5. Rodriguez v. District Court for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Fognani v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. People v. HarlanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. State of Iowa v. Lavelle Lonelle McKinleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  4. People v. KellingColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. People v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API