Bercier v. Kiga
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Alex Bercier appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his declaratory judgment action. He argues he should be exempt from all Washington excise taxes and regulations because, as a member of the Fort Peck Indian Tribe who resides and sells tobacco products on the Puyallup Indian reservation, he is an Indian doing business *813on Indian trust land, entitled to exemptions under RCW 82.24.260, .900, and 82.26.040. Holding that Bercier is not entitled to a tax exemption because he is not enrolled in the Puyallup Tribe on whose land he is doing business, we affirm.
Hunt, J. —
*813FACTS
¶2 Alex Bercier is an…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band of Potawatomi Tribe of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- County of Yakima v. Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Allen v. Asbestos Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Collins v. Clark County Fire District No. 5Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- United States v. WilburCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Larry Riley v. Iron Gate Self StorageCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Skagit County Public Hospital District No. 1 v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.