Legal Opinion

Okeson v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 2007No. 77888-4PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

150 P.3d 556 (2007)

Rud OKESON, Doris Burns, Walter L. Williams and Arthur T. Lane, individually and on behalf of the class of all persons similarly situated, Appellants,

v.

The CITY OF SEATTLE, Respondent.

No. 77888-4.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued May 23, 2006.

Decided January 18, 2007.

David Florian Jurca, Richard S. White, Connie K. Haslam, Helsell Fetterman, LLP, Seattle, for Appellants.

William Howard Patton, Foster Pepper PLLC, Suzanne Lieberman Smith, Seattle City Attorney's Office, Seattle, for Respondent.

Michael J. Robinson-Dorn, Elizabeth Thomas, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital v. Franklin CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Okeson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Okeson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. KEY TRONIC CORPORATION, INC. v. Aetna (CIGNA) Fire Underwriters Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Friends of North Spokane County Parks v. Spokane CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. Nisqually Indian Tribe v. GregoireDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2009
  3. Ago, Washington Attorney General Reports2009
  4. Ago, Washington Attorney General Reports2009
  5. Ago, Washington Attorney General Reports2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API