Casey v. Grantham
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
Upon the essential or ultimate facts stated in the complaint, which on a demurrer we are required to construe liberally with a view to substantial justice between the parties with every reasonable intendment to be made in favor of the pleader, these three questions are presented for decision: First, does the complaint state a cause of action for an accounting and settlement of partnership affairs between the partners W. D. Casey, Jr., and Harold J. Grantham; Second, can the plaintiffs enjoin the foreclosure sale under the deed of trust of the partnership property and the home and farm of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dilworth v. CurtsIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Pugh v. . NewbernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Ezzell v. . MerrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Huskins v. Yancey Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Bankers Trust Co. v. KneeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Hajmm Co. v. House of Raeford Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Dallaire v. Bank of America, N.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
- Kaplan v. O.K. Technologies, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Compton v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Austin Maintenance & Construction, Inc. v. Crowder Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.