Legal Opinion

Casey v. Grantham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 1954No. 236PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

Upon the essential or ultimate facts stated in the complaint, which on a demurrer we are required to construe liberally with a view to substantial justice between the parties with every reasonable intendment to be made in favor of the pleader, these three questions are presented for decision: First, does the complaint state a cause of action for an accounting and settlement of partnership affairs between the partners W. D. Casey, Jr., and Harold J. Grantham; Second, can the plaintiffs enjoin the foreclosure sale under the deed of trust of the partnership property and the home and farm of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dilworth v. CurtsIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Pugh v. . NewbernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Ezzell v. . MerrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Huskins v. Yancey Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Bankers Trust Co. v. KneeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Hajmm Co. v. House of Raeford Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Dallaire v. Bank of America, N.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
  3. Kaplan v. O.K. Technologies, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. Compton v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Austin Maintenance & Construction, Inc. v. Crowder Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API