Legal Opinion

Ezzell v. . Merritt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 8, 1944PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNny, J.

The following provisions are contained in G. S., 1-68: “All persons having an interest in the subject of the action, and in obtaining the relief demanded may be joined as plaintiffs, either jointly, severally, or in the alternative, except as otherwise provided. If, upon the application of any party, it shall appear that such joinder may embarrass or delay the trial, the court may order separate trials or make such other order as may be expedient.” G. S., 1-123, reads in part as follows: “The plaintiff may unite in the same complaint several causes of action, of legal or equitable nature, or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hamlin v. . TuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  2. Young v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  3. Finch v. . BaskervilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  4. Ins. Co. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  5. State Ex Rel. Moseley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Casey v. GranthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Rudisill v. HoyleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Teague v. Siler City Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. McBryde v. COGGINS-McINTOSH LUMBER COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. McDaniel v. FordhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API