Legal Opinion
Lyons v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 3, 1999No. 99-71 CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Senior Judge.
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, filed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(4) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims. Plaintiff, a military retiree, brought the underlying civilian action pursuant to 37 U.S.C. § 204(a)(1), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 2201 (1999), seeking-money damages, injunctive relief, and declaratory relief. For the reasons set forth below, the court ALLOWS defendant’s motion to dismiss.
BACKGROUND
I. Facts
The following facts are undisputed for the purpose…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tindle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Southern California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- PCL Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.