Pentagen Technologies Int'l, Ltd. v. Committee on Appropriations of the United States House of Representatives
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KESSLER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Pentagen Technologies Int’l Ltd. (“Pentagen”) and Russell Varnado 1 seek to review and copy a series of investigative reports prepared for the House Appropriations Committee (“Appropriations Committee” or “Committee”) of the United States House of Representatives. The reports relate to a federal government program, the Department of Defense’s Sustaining Base Information Services (“SBIS”) program, for which the Committee recommended appropriate funding levels. The reports have not been released to the public, and the Committee has refused to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gravel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Eastland v. United States Servicemen's FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Barenblatt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- McGrain v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pentagen Technologies International Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Adam B. SchiffCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
- Jason Leopold v. J. Thomas MangerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024
- Pentagen Technologies International Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Adam B. SchiffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.