Legal Opinion
Pentagen Technologies International Ltd. v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 5, 2001No. 98 CIV. 1090(JES)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Pentagen Technologies International Limited. (“Pentagen”) and Russell D. Varnado (“Varnado”) (collectively “plaintiffs”) filed the instant action alleging violations of 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-33 (2001) (the “False Claims Act” or the “FCA”) and abuse of process against defendants United States of America (“United States”) and E.F. Brasseur (“Brasseur”) (collectively “the Government defendants”), CACI Int’l, Inc., CACI Systems Integration, Inc., and CACI, Inc. Federal (collectively “CACI”), and various other individual corporations, attorneys, and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Aryai v. Forfeiture Support Associates, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Lipin v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. OF PITTSBURGHDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- De Carlo v. RatnerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Beatrice Boyer v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- ED Capital, LLC v. Bloomfield Investment Resources Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.