Legal Opinion
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Adam B. Schiff
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 27, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2019-3790Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 19-cv-3790 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell ADAM B. SCHIFF, Chairman, U.S. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Judicial Watch, Inc. asserts that the common-law right of access requires defendants, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (“HPSCI” or “Committee”) and Adam B. Schiff, in his capacity as HPSCI’s Chairman, to disclose subpoenas issued in September 2019, and associated responses received, by HPSCI…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.