Barenblatt v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan
Once more the Court is required to resolve the conflicting constitutional claims of congressional power and of an individual’s right to resist its exercise. The congressional power in question concerns the internal process of Congress in moving within its legislative domain; it involves the utilization of its committees to secure “testimony needed to enable it efficiently to exercise a legislative function belonging to it under the Constitution.” McGrain v. Daugherty, 273 U. S. 135, 160. The power of inquiry has been employed by Congress throughout our history, over the whole range of the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by486 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Zant v. StephensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
481 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.