State v. Birmingham
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STRUCKMEYER, Justice.
Appellees have petitioned this Court for a rehearing limited to the procedural aspect of this Court’s decision, 95 Ariz. 310, 390 P.2d 103. In our decision, we held that the statute A.R.S. § 12 — 2101 providing when an appeal may be taken to this Court was substantive and controlled over the provisions of the procedural Rule 58(a), Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S. We now are of the opinion that while the right to appeal is substantive the manner in which the right may be exercised is subject to control through the use of procedural rules.
Uniformly, the substantive law…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Meagher v. KavliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Blood v. Gibson Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
- Petty Et Ux. v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1948
- State v. BirminghamArizona Supreme Court · 1964
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Florida Rules of Criminal ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Seisinger v. SiebelArizona Supreme Court · 2009
- Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Director of InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Montgomery v. SheldonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.