Legal Opinion

State v. McNally

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 8, 2015No. 111152528; A150977PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for second-degree criminal trespass, ORS 164.245, interfering with a peace officer, ORS 162.247, and resisting arrest, ORS 162.315, raising two assignments of error. Defendant first contends that the trial court erred by refusing to instruct the jury that a person does not commit the crime of interfering with a peace officer by engaging in passive resistance. Defendant next contends that the trial court erred by instructing the jury that a peace officer “may use physical force” when arresting a person if “the officer reasonably believes physical…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. VanornumOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. OliphantOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. WoodmanOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. McNallyOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. AbramCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. WorshamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  4. State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. State v. FlackCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API