State v. Washington
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
DUNCAN, J. pro tempore
In this criminal case, defendant appealed from the judgments in two cases, assigning error to her conviction for interfering with a peace officer (IPO), ORS 162.247,1 in one of the cases.2 We affirmed without a written opinion, State v. Washington, 284 Or App 315, 391 P3d 1011 (2017).
Now, defendant and the state have filed a joint petition for reconsideration of that decision.3 See ORAP 6.25 (governing petitions for reconsideration). The parties agree that, under the Supreme Court’s decision in State v. McNally, 361 Or 314, 392 P3d 721 (2017), which was issued after our…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. McNallyOregon Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. InloesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. PatneskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. McNallyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. MoravekCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. EstabrookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018