Legal Opinion

State v. Abram

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 2, 2015No. 12C43548; A153191PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm. ORS 166.250. Under ORS 166.250(1), a person commits that crime by, among other things, knowingly carrying “any firearm concealed upon the person.” For purposes of that statute, “[flirearms carried openly in belt holsters are not concealed.” ORS 166.250(3). Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury that “the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt * * * that the firearm was not carried openly in a belt holster.” As explained below, we conclude that the trial court so erred and,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. Vasquez-RubioOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. RaineyOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. StroupOregon Supreme Court · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MayoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. State v. MoravekCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. State v. LeakeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  4. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. State v. LeakeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API