Legal Opinion

Green v. A.P.C.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1998No. 65641-0PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTalmadge, J.

We are asked in this case to decide if distinct statutory limitations periods apply to putatively separate and distinct injuries arising from exposure to toxic products. We reaffirm the basic rule that for purposes of the statute of limitations a cause of action claiming harm from exposure to a toxic product accrues when the plaintiff knew or should have known the essential elements of the claim. As to the harm element of a claim, the plaintiffs action accrues ordinarily upon awareness of some appreciable injury caused by the exposure to the defendant’s toxic product even if the full extent…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Martin v. Abbott LaboratoriesWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Honcoop v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Adcox v. Children's Orthopedic Hospital & Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Tanner Electric Cooperative v. Puget Sound Power & LightWashington Supreme Court · 1996

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Tunstall v. BergesonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Francom v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. Tiffany Family Trust Corp. v. City of KentWashington Supreme Court · 2005

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API